International
experts and personalities will be invited to speak on” the Future of Lifelong
Learning”. A scientific committee, chaired by Pierre CASPAR, Professor
Emeritus at the CNAM, met on October 21, 2007 to discuss the contents and themes
of the round tables. Going deeper into the conclusions of the organizers in
October 2007, the group has enriched the various historical and institutional
issues raised earlier. Without giving a particular significance to this order,
we can cite the following themes, re-examined and reformulated in terms of
worldwide stakes, issues and prospects
 |
The
role of firms as regards training, the link with activity, work and
employment:
 |
Innovations
in teaching methods, contents, in terms of
“training-performance-assessment”
|
 |
Interactions
between education and training and production systems
|
|
 |
The
issue of family, vocational, social, inter-age transmission:
 |
Articulations
between formal, non formal, informal training
|
 |
Vocational
transmissions, social, cultural and vocational transmissions and
integrations and their relation with ideologies and policies
|
|
 |
The
very notion of lifelong learning, its roots and its foundations
 |
What
it implies, especially as regards the links between initial education
and continuing training
|
 |
Its
stakes and assets in various parts of the world, beyond specificities
and linguistic interpretations
|
 |
Possibility
of a world-wide view of lifelong learning?
|
|
 |
How
is lifelong learning financed?
 |
Origin
of the funds? Who controls them? Who regulates them?
|
 |
Related
to which political choices? Or to accompany which socioeconomic and
cultural transformations?
|
 |
Entailing
which assessments? Which return on investments should be announced,
expected, obtained?
|
|
 |
What
does “lifelong” mean when faced with occupational, social, family or
identity problems?
 |
Can
we secure the training schemes linked with life projects and with
recognition of prior experience?
|
 |
Which
links with training commitment and its maintenance when faced with the
evolution of motivation and of the reasons for for this training?
|
 |
Continuum
of learning and vagaries of life: sustainable training and sustainable
development
|
|
 |
Attractiveness,
diversity and mysteries of self-training:
 |
Isn’t
training always self-training? Initial education, formal education,
popular education, collective self-training!
|
 |
What
about incitation to self-training and the disengagement of
institutions?
|
 |
Are
there cultures based on self-training? To what extent do they question
formal education?
|
 |
Place
and role of self-training in the continuum
|
|
 |
Contributions
and myths of research in the field of education and training in relation
with political practices and choices:
 |
Should
such research be disciplinary?
|
 |
Institutional
interplay, financing and development of research
|
|
 |
Place,
role, stakes of network technologies in the development of lifelong
learning
|
 |
Initial
education as the structuring element of continuing training: how to
 |
bring
a maximum number of young people to the highest possible level?
|
 |
or
give them a taste for lifelong learning?
|
 |
avoid
catastrophes?
|
 |
enhance
the pleasure of learning?
|
|
 |
The
roles of higher education in economic and humanistic logics:
 |
Vocational focus in higher education in response to the logics of
development and globalization
|
 |
Nature
and responsibility of higher education and their limits:
educating/being educated? Recognizing/being recognized?
|
 |
Links
between practice and research within a concept of immaterial heritage
and transmission
|
 |
Disciplinary
logics and duty of openness and renewal
|
 |
Off
campuses universities or distance learning
|
|
 |
Same
question of responsibility for primary schools, secondary schools,
concerning lifelong learning
 |
Teachers’
and trainers’ jobs: new jobs appearing at all levels
|
 |
How
to create a European framework for the teaching profession?
|
 |
How
to define it in a global world?
|
|
More
generally, this theme of responsibility linked with that of inequalities can be
approached with a global vision including families, home background, social
groups, and, of course, institutions.
The
credibility and future stakes of the very notion of lifelong learning… or a rereading of the white paper of the European Union, of the UNESCO Report
in 1996, or of the Lisbon commitments in 2000, for example, current disruptions
and hazards.
|